Someone has to run it on Monday.
Data quality is not a project outcome, it's an operating discipline. Plenty of well-built programs decay within a year because the stewardship work landed on people who already had full-time jobs.
The failure mode nobody scopes for.
The program delivers. Golden records are live, policy is published, stewards are named. Then the steward role turns out to be four hours a week on top of an existing role, the exception queue grows, the quality report stops being read, and eighteen months later you're commissioning another assessment.
This isn't a discipline problem. It's a resourcing problem that was never costed, usually because the people who scoped the program had no incentive to raise it.
What we run
We work the exception queues, investigate quality alerts, maintain match and survivorship rules as sources change, keep the inventory and ownership map current, chase the review dates, and produce a monthly report that says plainly what improved, what degraded and what needs a decision from you.
It's a monthly service with no minimum term. Scale it up during a migration, scale it down when your team has capacity, stop it when you no longer need it — the whole point is that you're not structurally dependent on us.
Being honest about the incentive
An ongoing service creates an obvious temptation: leave the system needing more manual work than it should. We deal with that directly. The monthly report includes exception volume trend, and if that trend isn't going down we owe you an explanation and a fix — not more hours.
- Term
- Monthly, no lock-in
- Scale
- Up or down each month
- Reporting
- Monthly, plain English
- Exception trend
- Reported every month
- Escalation
- Named contact
- Exit
- Runbooks stay yours
We'll tell you when your internal team is ready to take a function back, because a managed service you no longer need is a cost we shouldn't be charging you for.
What we take on.
- Exception queue managementMatch exceptions and data quality issues worked to an agreed service level, not left to accumulate.
- Rule maintenanceMatch, merge and survivorship rules updated as source systems change shape.
- Quality monitoringContinuous measurement with investigation of anything that moves the wrong way.
- Inventory & ownership upkeepNew systems added, departed owners reassigned, review dates chased before they lapse.
- Feed healthIntegration monitoring, failure triage and replay, so a broken feed is found by us and not by your CFO.
- Monthly reportWhat improved, what degraded, what needs a decision — in plain English, no scorecard theatre.
- Governance upkeepPolicy reviews, classification changes and issue closure kept moving between forums.
- Capability transferOngoing enablement so your team can take functions back whenever they're ready to.
Worth knowing before you buy.
Is this just staff augmentation?+
Can we take it back in-house later?+
Do you have to have built it to run it?+
Talk about what happens after go-live.
Whether we built it or not, we can tell you what running it properly actually takes — before you commit to it.